Mysterious Contrails Off California Coast and NO Explanation?!

November 9th, 2010

Monday, November 8, 2010 a mysterious contrail was noticed in the sky off the coast of California. Observers thought it was either some type of plane or (more likely) a missile launch. Of course the Pentagon, Air Force, Navy, even NASA are denying any involvement and are basically playing dumb. Let’s face it – the government only tells us what they want us to hear. My guess – the military fired a missile that we weren’t supposed to see.

I have no idea what’s going on, nor am I going to speculate, but of this I am certain – we only know what we know. There are so many things that go on behind close doors, in undisclosed locations, and in secret meetings that We The People are beyond ignorant about most government operations. I think this is an isolated “Oops” incident for which someone was ripped a new one. How dare they disobey protocol and leak such an operation to the local news!

Here are some links to various articles:

Mystery Contrail Off California Coast – FoxNews

Mystery Missile Launch Seen off Calif. Coast – CBSNews

Did you like this? Share it:

Compare and Contrast: What Obama Says, and What Obama Really Says.

November 6th, 2010

In late 2009 President Obama addressed both houses of Congress and the American people in his first State of the Union address. In it he said the following:

“[…] tonight I’m proposing steps to pay for the trillion dollars that it took to rescue the economy last year. Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. […] Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t. We will continue to go through the budget, line by line, page by page, to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work. We’ve already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. To help working families, we’ll extend our middle-class tax cuts. But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts […] for those making over $250,000 a year. We just can’t afford it.”

First of all, the President made this address sound as though he took office, spent a truckload of money, and is now going to work patiently and diligently to repay what he borrowed to stimulate the economy. Hmmm. Where did he get all that money?

Secondly, he mentions waiting until 2011 to “freeze government spending”, but why? At that time, we knew healthcare reform was being debated, but had no idea how if/when it would pass Congress, nor what it would cost the American people. We now know it passed in 2010 (ironically before the government spending freeze) and drove America into multi-trillion dollars of additional debt.

Now, the President wants us to think that they’ve already made enormous strides in the right direction, by analyzing the federal budget they’re identifying holes in the sinking ship. Does $20 billion sound like a lot? It is. I don’t anticipate making $20 billion in 100 lifetimes. But when you compare $20 billion to the $1 trillion that he spent just to “avoid another Great Depression”, well it seems like so little. Let me put it to you this way:

$20 Billion

I would like to point out that Obama promised an extension of the Bush tax cuts during the State of the Union address, which promise he’s planning to keep, or so he says. Here’s a partial copy of the transcript of President Obama’s Weekly Address (November 6, 2010):

“But the last thing we should do is raise taxes on middle-class families.  For the past decade, they saw their costs rise, their incomes fall, and too many jobs go overseas.  They’re the ones bearing the brunt of the recession.  They’re the ones having trouble making ends meet. They are the ones who need relief right now.

[…] I believe we should permanently extend the Bush tax cuts for all families making less than $250,000 a year.  That’s 98 percent of the American people.

[…] if Congress were to implement my proposal to freeze non-security discretionary spending for three years, it would bring this spending down to its lowest level as share of the economy in 50 years.

But at a time when we are going to ask folks across the board to make such difficult sacrifices, I don’t see how we can afford to borrow an additional $700 billion from other countries to make all the Bush tax cuts permanent, even for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans.  We’d be digging ourselves into an even deeper fiscal hole and passing the burden on to our children.

I recognize that both parties are going to have to work together and compromise to get something done here.  But I want to make my priorities clear from the start.  One: middle class families need permanent tax relief. And two: I believe we can’t afford to borrow and spend another $700 billion on permanent tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.”

I had to exercise my 1st amendment rights on this one. Let’s look at this a little deeper. We just experienced a historical election where the Republicans took back control of the House of Representatives, and experienced multiple take-overs in the Senate. Today’s Weekly Address sounds more like a nervous President who earlier thought he’d be serving two terms, but after losing his grip on Congress is beginning to realize he’ll get what’s coming to him.

I’ll give the man credit, he said he would extend the tax cuts and he appears to intend to. What bothers me is how he approaches the “cost” to continue by basically punishing the millionaires and billionaires for earning extraordinary incomes. You read what he said, this is what I believe he was actually saying (by the way, he said “the campaign season is over”, but it sounds like he’s already started his 2012 reelection campaign):

“Alright America. Alright. I get it. Yeah, you know I campaigned for President on a promise of change. In fact, I even had the majority of you waving signs and chanting “Yes we can!” You’re right, I got in office, took control of both houses of Congress and ran behind closed doors to push my own agenda. I told you I’d bring change, which I did, but it wasn’t anything like what I told you I’d do, or what you actually wanted.

Nice work. You successfully slapped me in the face by taking back control of the House. Dangit. I mean, look we’ll work together to get the work done that we should have started two years ago, right? I tell you what, let’s just forget about the TRILLIONS of dollars I’ve spent while in office. The most important thing (for you 98% of Americans) is that I’m a caring, generous President and more than willing to extend the Bush tax cuts. It won’t be difficult to pay for. I know we can’t afford it. I mean, come on, where are we going to find $700B? What? Where did I get the money for the Stimulus Bill, Jobs Bill, GM Bailout, Healthcare Reform? Ummm.

Look too many people in this country (approximately 2%) earn way too much money. How does it make you feel knowing that CEOs, movie stars, professional athletes are raking in millions a year while you just barely get by at your job? Don’t worry. I got you covered. We’ll just yank the $700B from these guys. Come on! They don’t need all that money! The most important thing we can do for America is redistribute the wealth. No! That’s not socialism, it’s called sharing.”

My only hope is that Obama has successfully convinced America that he’s not the man he was on the campaign trail. He wanted something, he got it. It doesn’t matter who we, the American people, are. Obama has his own agenda, his own objectives, and his own purpose. God save us all if this man’s reelected, and shame on you who supported him in the first place. I didn’t want to but, I told you so!

Did you like this? Share it:

Ruminating on the world in which we live.

October 20th, 2010

“In the world we live in people are connected in new ways. Although entirely impersonal, somehow we’re able to extricate what we now consider “meaningful” relationships, both personal and professional. However, we also create for ourselves the idyllic version of self. Hidden behind an alias, screen name, or pseudo-cyber-profile, when online you can be anyone you choose to be.

Our children look to Hollywood for the answers to questions of fashion, relationships, and life. They compare themselves to the cover of a magazine hoping to achieve what others have become enslaved to have – a perfect body, money, wealth, fame and fortune.

We live in a time when teachers are paid so little many take on part-time jobs during the summer just to make rent. While at the same time, a member of an NFL team can break his ankle during practice and ride the bench, and his $2 million contract for the rest of the season without setting foot on the gridiron.”

Did you like this? Share it:

Why am I going to college?

October 12th, 2010

I often ask myself this question, especially when I’m getting home between 8 and 10:00 PM 4 nights a week. I’m also curious when I spend my weekends reading, studying, finishing homework just in time to submit an assignment and start the next one.

I guess the answer to this question is dynamic, it’s always changing. There are days where I’m confident the hours spent studying, the miles spent getting to / from school (56 one-way) will pay off, literally. Of course, there are days when I couldn’t care less about my grades, or any future semester(s).

If nothing else, there are at least 2 reasons to go to college, at least for me, and they’re related: lump sum cash, and steady income, aka. money. The federal government’s loan program, and financial aid helps to pay for tuition and books, anything left over is direct deposited into my bank account, a la “lump sum cash”. As a veteran of the armed forces, I’m paid monthly through the GI Bill, a la “steady income”. In both cases I maximize the financial reward available by enrolling in at least 12 credit hours or full-time. Now, I know the federal loan program requirements for repayment are rather strict, so the money they give me comes with a price tag known as interest, but the majority of the loan amount I’ve received is subsidized. This means the government pays the interest against my loan until I graduate, quit school, etc. The unsubsidized loans, well I’ll deal with them when they come due.

I want my children (I can say that now because Sarah and I are pregnant!) to be proud of me. A college education doesn’t guarantee intelligence, but it does indicate an admirable level of discipline and hard work; I want my children to see that in their father. An obvious reason for going to college is to move up the corporate ladder. I’ve been on a lower rung at UnitedHealthcare selling health insurance for over a year. I hope that with experience and a degree I’ll have a fighting chance at new opportunities within the organization.

Whether or not I like to admit it, being a student helps keep my life in rhythm. By having a schedule of classes, assignments, exams, etc, college forces me to remain (at least somewhat) disciplined. I really enjoy learning through reading and self-study, and being in school further encourages and advances my personal development.

That’s why I go to college, I guess. ;)

Did you like this? Share it:

Is it OK to remain on disability, permanently?

October 3rd, 2010

First of all I want to make a few things clear – by “disability” I am referring to the US Government’s Federal Social Security Disability Insurance Program. I also want to point out that I talk to, deal with, and provide insurance coverage to people on disability on a daily basis. I also cater to the healthcare needs of our nation’s seniors, those who are 65 years of age and older, but I digress.

THE SHORT ANSWER

NO! It’s not OK to remain on disability permanently.

THE LONG ANSWER
I have to laugh when I read the this explanation by the Social Security Administration:

Social Security pays benefits to people who cannot work because they have a medical condition that is expected to last at least one year or result in death. Federal law requires this very strict definition of disability. While some programs give money to people with partial disability or short-term disability, Social Security does not.

In other words, the government doesn’t intend to ever STOP paying disability benefits. I don’t know the whole history, but I know where funding for this program comes: SUTA and FUTA, aka. State Unemployment TAx, and Federal Unemployment TAx. These taxes are paid by your employer for you, and every other employee on payroll. This is one of the taxes that aren’t required to be paid by the employee.

What, you think I’m too harsh? You wonder to yourself, “Why doesn’t this goon believe in social welfare?” Look, the program’s already in place, so to do away with disability would mean to leave millions of Americans in poverty. While I might not totally disagree with so doing, I’d like to offer a modification to the existing program.

Flip the program from what it is – long-term disability, and make it short-term, temporary, and intended to work similar to unemployment (Oh, don’t get me started. I’ll get back to unemployment). I believe if you’re injured, and unable to work, the disability program should help pay for healthcare costs associated with your disability/accident, rehabilitation costs whether it be therapy, job-skills training, resume writing, etc. However, I disagree with sending a no-strings-attached check to an eligible beneficiary. Let’s be serious, how many disability checks actually pay for disability expenses. I can almost guarantee most of the checks in circulation pay living expenses (understandably, these people “can’t” work, right?), some food, and of course – beer and cigarettes!

I understand accidents happen, and there are people out there who have been innocently maimed and have been left totally and completely unable to work. I also know a quadriplegic who holds a full-time job, owns his own home, and married an attractive young woman. Where on the spectrum do you draw the line? Unfortunately that’s a tough question to answer because too many people have those aggravating things called “feelings” and may get offended if the government decided to cut them off!

Conclusion
The public should be encouraged to invest in various insurance policies to protect them against the unforeseen. You insure your car because it’s likely your second largest investment, you probably rely on it for transportation to-and-from work (well, unless you’re “disabled”), and you want to be able to replace it in the event it’s totaled in an accident. You insure your property through homeowner’s or renter’s insurance in order to recoup your loss(es) in the event of theft, fire, or other [natural] disaster. You may also insure your life, so that your family has some sort of financial security in the event of your premature demise. In addition to the aforementioned, how about AD&D (Accidental Death & Dismemberment), especially if you’re in a high-risk occupation, short-term/long-term disability (the subject of this post, but from the private sector in this case), etc.

STOP Depending on the Government! Wake up and take some responsibility!

Did you like this? Share it: